Commit 77328a1b2a5d8c72390491fa41f608d7a4ec60d4
Exists in
master
test
Showing 1 changed file Side-by-side Diff
ifcs2018_poster.tex
... | ... | @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ |
104 | 104 | \begin{enumerate} |
105 | 105 | \setcounter{enumi}{1} |
106 | 106 | \item \textbf{Alternative way (our focus):}\\ |
107 | - Chain of little filters | |
107 | + Chain of small filters | |
108 | 108 | \begin{itemize}[label=$\Rightarrow$, noitemsep, nolistsep] |
109 | 109 | {\color{Green}\item Great rejection} |
110 | 110 | {\color{Green}\item Consume less resources on FPGA} |
111 | 111 | |
... | ... | @@ -167,11 +167,16 @@ |
167 | 167 | \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/fir-mono-vs-fir-series-noise-fixe-jmf.pdf} |
168 | 168 | \captionof{figure}{Custom criterion} |
169 | 169 | \end{minipage} |
170 | +<<<<<<< HEAD | |
170 | 171 | \item {\bf Rejection}: the last configuration is better than the first but worse |
171 | 172 | than the monolithic filter |
172 | 173 | \item Resources {\bf consumption}: last filter is better than the single monolithic filter |
173 | 174 | (monolithic does not fit in available resources) |
174 | 175 | \vspace{-.33cm} |
176 | +======= | |
177 | + \item For the rejection: the last configuration is better than the first one but it's worst than monolithic filter | |
178 | + \item For the resources consumption: the last one is better than the single filter | |
179 | +>>>>>>> de0f544773b03c4215f07cea693fc7eb145ff20a | |
175 | 180 | \begin{center} |
176 | 181 | \begin{tabular}{|c|ccccc|}\hline |
177 | 182 | FIR & BlockRAM36 & BlockRAM18 & LookUpTables & DSP & rejection (dB)\\\hline\hline |