Commit de0f544773b03c4215f07cea693fc7eb145ff20a
1 parent
08e32d5a93
Exists in
master
Corrections de quelques erreurs.
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 3 deletions Side-by-side Diff
ifcs2018_poster.tex
| ... | ... | @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ |
| 84 | 84 | \begin{enumerate} |
| 85 | 85 | \setcounter{enumi}{1} |
| 86 | 86 | \item \textbf{Alternative way (our focus):}\\ |
| 87 | - Chain of little filters | |
| 87 | + Chain of small filters | |
| 88 | 88 | \begin{itemize}[label=$\Rightarrow$, noitemsep, nolistsep] |
| 89 | 89 | {\color{Green}\item Great rejection} |
| 90 | 90 | {\color{Green}\item Consume less resources on FPGA} |
| ... | ... | @@ -140,8 +140,8 @@ |
| 140 | 140 | \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/fir-mono-vs-fir-series-noise-fixe-jmf.pdf} |
| 141 | 141 | \captionof{figure}{Custom criterion} |
| 142 | 142 | \end{minipage} |
| 143 | - \item For the rejection: the last configuration is better than the first but it's worst than monolithic filter | |
| 144 | - \item For the resources consumption: the last better than the single filter | |
| 143 | + \item For the rejection: the last configuration is better than the first one but it's worst than monolithic filter | |
| 144 | + \item For the resources consumption: the last one is better than the single filter | |
| 145 | 145 | \begin{center} |
| 146 | 146 | \begin{tabular}{|c|ccccc|}\hline |
| 147 | 147 | FIR & BlockRAM36 & BlockRAM18 & LookUpTables & DSP & rejection (dB)\\\hline\hline |