Commit ef6d349d4f87d1d51e38e397728bdc2d5b67e390
Exists in
master
ajouts suite a discussion avec Arthur
Showing 1 changed file Inline Diff
ifcs2018_poster.tex
\documentclass[a4paper]{article} | 1 | 1 | \documentclass[a4paper]{article} | |
\usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{color} | 2 | 2 | \usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{color} | |
\usepackage[english]{babel} | 3 | 3 | \usepackage[english]{babel} | |
\usepackage{url,graphicx,enumitem,enumitem,caption} | 4 | 4 | \usepackage{url,graphicx,enumitem,enumitem,caption} | |
5 | 5 | |||
\definecolor{title_color}{rgb}{0.050980, 0.325490, 0.580392} | 6 | 6 | \definecolor{title_color}{rgb}{0.050980, 0.325490, 0.580392} | |
7 | 7 | |||
\newcommand{\newsection}[1] { | 8 | 8 | \newcommand{\newsection}[1] { | |
{\color{title_color}\section*{#1}} | 9 | 9 | {\color{title_color}\section*{#1}} | |
} | 10 | 10 | } | |
11 | 11 | |||
\newcommand{\addblock}[2] { | 12 | 12 | \newcommand{\addblock}[2] { | |
\begin{minipage}[t]{#1} | 13 | 13 | \begin{minipage}[t]{#1} | |
#2 | 14 | 14 | #2 | |
\end{minipage} | 15 | 15 | \end{minipage} | |
} | 16 | 16 | } | |
17 | 17 | |||
\newcommand{\addalignedblock}[3] { | 18 | 18 | \newcommand{\addalignedblock}[3] { | |
\begin{minipage}[c]{#1} | 19 | 19 | \begin{minipage}[c]{#1} | |
\begin{#2} | 20 | 20 | \begin{#2} | |
#3 | 21 | 21 | #3 | |
\end{#2} | 22 | 22 | \end{#2} | |
\end{minipage} | 23 | 23 | \end{minipage} | |
} | 24 | 24 | } | |
25 | 25 | |||
\textheight=29.7cm | 26 | 26 | \textheight=29.7cm | |
\topmargin=-3.6cm | 27 | 27 | \topmargin=-3.6cm | |
\oddsidemargin=-2cm | 28 | 28 | \oddsidemargin=-2cm | |
\textwidth=19.5cm | 29 | 29 | \textwidth=19.5cm | |
\pagestyle{empty} | 30 | 30 | \pagestyle{empty} | |
31 | 31 | |||
\begin{document} | 32 | 32 | \begin{document} | |
33 | 33 | |||
% Title | 34 | 34 | % Title | |
\begin{center} | 35 | 35 | \begin{center} | |
\textbf{{\scshape | 36 | 36 | \textbf{{\scshape | |
\LARGE\color{OliveGreen} | 37 | 37 | \LARGE\color{OliveGreen} | |
Filter optimization for real time digital processing of radiofrequency signals: application | 38 | 38 | Filter optimization for real time digital processing of radiofrequency signals: application | |
to oscillator metrology | 39 | 39 | to oscillator metrology | |
\\}} | 40 | 40 | \\}} | |
\end{center} | 41 | 41 | \end{center} | |
42 | 42 | |||
\vspace{-0.35cm} | 43 | 43 | \vspace{-0.35cm} | |
% Authors | 44 | 44 | % Authors | |
\begin{center} | 45 | 45 | \begin{center} | |
\addalignedblock{0.18\textwidth}{flushleft}{% | 46 | 46 | \addalignedblock{0.18\textwidth}{flushleft}{% | |
\includegraphics[height=1.6cm]{images/logo_ubfc} | 47 | 47 | \includegraphics[height=1.6cm]{images/logo_ubfc} | |
} | 48 | 48 | } | |
\addalignedblock{0.28\textwidth}{center}{% | 49 | 49 | \addalignedblock{0.28\textwidth}{center}{% | |
A. \textsc{Hugeat}$^{*}$, J. \textsc{Bernard}\\ | 50 | 50 | A. \textsc{Hugeat}$^{*}$, J. \textsc{Bernard}\\ | |
~\\ | 51 | 51 | ~\\ | |
FEMTO-ST, DISC dept., Besan\c con, France | 52 | 52 | FEMTO-ST, DISC dept., Besan\c con, France | |
} | 53 | 53 | } | |
\addalignedblock{0.28\textwidth}{center}{% | 54 | 54 | \addalignedblock{0.28\textwidth}{center}{% | |
G. \textsc{Goavec-Merou},\\ | 55 | 55 | G. \textsc{Goavec-Merou},\\ | |
P.-Y. \textsc{Bourgeois}, J.-M \textsc{Friedt}\\ | 56 | 56 | P.-Y. \textsc{Bourgeois}, J.-M \textsc{Friedt}\\ | |
$^{*}$FEMTO-ST, Time \& Frequency dept., Besan\c con, France | 57 | 57 | $^{*}$FEMTO-ST, Time \& Frequency dept., Besan\c con, France | |
} | 58 | 58 | } | |
\addalignedblock{0.18\textwidth}{flushright}{% | 59 | 59 | \addalignedblock{0.18\textwidth}{flushright}{% | |
\includegraphics[height=1.4cm]{images/logo_femto} | 60 | 60 | \includegraphics[height=1.4cm]{images/logo_femto} | |
} | 61 | 61 | } | |
\end{center} | 62 | 62 | \end{center} | |
63 | 63 | |||
% First part | 64 | 64 | % First part | |
\vspace{-.61cm} | 65 | 65 | \vspace{-.61cm} | |
\newsection{Digital signal processing of ultrastable clock signals} | 66 | 66 | \newsection{Digital signal processing of ultrastable clock signals} | |
67 | 67 | |||
\vspace{-.21cm} | 68 | 68 | \vspace{-.21cm} | |
%\begin{minipage}[t]{\linewidth} | 69 | 69 | %\begin{minipage}[t]{\linewidth} | |
%\begin{minipage}{.7\linewidth} | 70 | 70 | %\begin{minipage}{.7\linewidth} | |
\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*] | 71 | 71 | \begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*] | |
\setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% | 72 | 72 | \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% | |
\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% | 73 | 73 | \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% | |
\item | 74 | 74 | \item | |
{\bf Digital phase noise characterization}: flexibility (software defined local | 75 | 75 | {\bf Digital phase noise characterization}: flexibility (software defined local | |
oscillator),\\ stability (no long term drift), reconfigurabilty | 76 | 76 | oscillator),\\ stability (no long term drift), reconfigurabilty | |
$\Rightarrow$ {\bf software defined radio} oscillator \\ | 77 | 77 | $\Rightarrow$ {\bf software defined radio} oscillator \\ | |
phase noise characterization | 78 | 78 | phase noise characterization | |
\item analog to digital conversion of radiofrequency signal, software | 79 | 79 | \item analog to digital conversion of radiofrequency signal, software | |
defined local oscillator, | 80 | 80 | defined local oscillator, | |
mixer and {\bf low pass filter} | 81 | 81 | mixer and {\bf low pass filter} | |
\item low pass filter uses most resources and introduces latency (phase delay | 82 | 82 | \item low pass filter uses most resources and introduces latency (phase delay | |
in feedback loop): needs to be optimized | 83 | 83 | in feedback loop): needs to be optimized | |
\end{itemize} | 84 | 84 | \end{itemize} | |
%\end{minipage} | 85 | 85 | %\end{minipage} | |
%\begin{minipage}{.28\linewidth} | 86 | 86 | %\begin{minipage}{.28\linewidth} | |
87 | 87 | |||
\vspace{-3cm}\hfill\includegraphics[width=.28\linewidth]{schema} | 88 | 88 | \vspace{-3cm}\hfill\includegraphics[width=.28\linewidth]{schema} | |
%\end{minipage} | 89 | 89 | %\end{minipage} | |
%\end{minipage} | 90 | 90 | %\end{minipage} | |
91 | 91 | |||
\vspace{1.29cm} | 92 | 92 | \vspace{1.29cm} | |
\hrule{\hfill} | 93 | 93 | \hrule{\hfill} | |
% Second part | 94 | 94 | % Second part | |
\vspace{-.61cm} | 95 | 95 | \vspace{-.61cm} | |
\newsection{Filter design and implementation strategy:} | 96 | 96 | \newsection{Filter design and implementation strategy:} | |
%\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*] | 97 | 97 | %\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*] | |
%\setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% | 98 | 98 | %\setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% | |
%\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% | 99 | 99 | %\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% | |
\vspace{-.40cm} | 100 | 100 | \vspace{-.40cm} | |
\addblock{0.44\textwidth}{ | 101 | 101 | \addblock{0.44\textwidth}{ | |
% \begin{enumerate}[noitemsep,nolistsep] | 102 | 102 | % \begin{enumerate}[noitemsep,nolistsep] | |
% \item | 103 | 103 | % \item | |
\textbf{1. Classical way:}\\ | 104 | 104 | \textbf{1. Classical way:}\\ | |
Compute the transfer function of a monolithic filter | 105 | 105 | Compute the transfer function of a monolithic filter | |
\begin{itemize}[label=$\Rightarrow$, noitemsep, nolistsep] | 106 | 106 | \begin{itemize}[label=$\Rightarrow$, noitemsep, nolistsep] | |
{\color{Green}\item Simplest way to design filter} | 107 | 107 | {\color{Green}\item Simplest way to design filter} | |
{\color{Green}\item Great rejection} | 108 | 108 | {\color{Green}\item Great rejection} | |
{\color{Red}\item Consume lot of resources on FPGA} | 109 | 109 | {\color{Red}\item Consume lot of resources on FPGA} | |
\end{itemize} | 110 | 110 | \end{itemize} | |
% \end{enumerate} | 111 | 111 | % \end{enumerate} | |
} | 112 | 112 | } | |
\addblock{0.40\textwidth}{ | 113 | 113 | \addblock{0.40\textwidth}{ | |
% \begin{enumerate} | 114 | 114 | % \begin{enumerate} | |
% \setcounter{enumi}{1} | 115 | 115 | % \setcounter{enumi}{1} | |
% \item | 116 | 116 | % \item | |
\textbf{2. Alternative way (our focus):}\\ | 117 | 117 | \textbf{2. Alternative way (our focus):}\\ | |
Chain of small filters | 118 | 118 | Chain of small filters | |
\begin{itemize}[label=$\Rightarrow$, noitemsep, nolistsep] | 119 | 119 | \begin{itemize}[label=$\Rightarrow$, noitemsep, nolistsep] | |
{\color{Green}\item Great rejection} | 120 | 120 | {\color{Green}\item Fewer resource consumption on FPGA} | |
{\color{Green}\item Consume less resources on FPGA} | 121 | 121 | {\color{Green}\item Greater rejection} | |
{\color{Red}\item Harder way to design filter} | 122 | 122 | {\color{Red}\item Harder way to design filter} | |
\end{itemize} | 123 | 123 | \end{itemize} | |
% \end{enumerate} | 124 | 124 | % \end{enumerate} | |
} | 125 | 125 | } | |
126 | 126 | |||
\vspace{-2.6cm}\hfill\includegraphics[width=.2\linewidth]{schema2} | 127 | 127 | \vspace{-2.6cm}\hfill\includegraphics[width=.2\linewidth]{schema2} | |
\vspace{-0.3cm} | 128 | 128 | \vspace{-0.3cm} | |
129 | 129 | |||
The 2\textsuperscript{nd} way could be considered as an optimization problem: | 130 | 130 | The 2\textsuperscript{nd} way could be considered as an optimization problem: | |
\begin{itemize}[noitemsep,nolistsep] | 131 | 131 | \begin{itemize}[noitemsep,nolistsep] | |
\item One or many {\bf performance criteria} (rejection, noise, | 132 | 132 | \item One or many {\bf performance criteria} (rejection, noise, | |
throughput...) | 133 | 133 | throughput...) | |
\item Limited {\bf resources} (area on FPGA) \hfill {\bf each FIR outputs} $y_n=\sum_{k=0}^{N_i} | 134 | 134 | \item Limited {\bf resources} (area on FPGA) \hfill {\bf each FIR outputs} $y_n=\sum_{k=0}^{N_i} | |
\underbrace{b_{i_k}}_{c_i\mbox{ \footnotesize bits}}\times x_{n-k}$ | 135 | 135 | \underbrace{b_{i_k}}_{c_i\mbox{ \footnotesize bits}}\times x_{n-k}$ | |
\end{itemize} | 136 | 136 | \end{itemize} | |
137 | 137 | |||
\vspace{-0.40cm} | 138 | 138 | \vspace{-0.40cm} | |
\noindent Expressed as a {\bf Mixed-Integer Linear Programming} (MILP) with GLPK solver | 139 | 139 | \noindent Expressed as a {\bf Mixed-Integer Linear Programming} (MILP) with GLPK solver | |
140 | 140 | |||
\noindent 3 degrees of freedom: number of filters, $N_i$ number of coeff. for each filter $i$, $c_i$ | 141 | 141 | \noindent 3 degrees of freedom: number of filters, $N_i$ number of coeff. for each filter $i$, $c_i$ | |
number of bits for coefficients of filter $i$ | 142 | 142 | number of bits for coefficients of filter $i$ | |
\vspace{.1cm} | 143 | 143 | \vspace{.1cm} | |
%\parbox{.60\linewidth}{ | 144 | 144 | %\parbox{.60\linewidth}{ | |
% \begin{enumerate}[noitemsep,nolistsep] | 145 | 145 | % \begin{enumerate}[noitemsep,nolistsep] | |
% \item | 146 | 146 | % \item | |
\noindent | 147 | 147 | \noindent | |
% \item | 148 | 148 | % \item | |
% \item | 149 | 149 | % \item | |
% \end{enumerate} | 150 | 150 | % \end{enumerate} | |
%} | 151 | 151 | %} | |
%\end{itemize} | 152 | 152 | %\end{itemize} | |
\vspace{-0.5cm} | 153 | 153 | \vspace{-0.5cm} | |
\newsection{Filter selection} | 154 | 154 | \newsection{Filter selection} | |
\vspace{-0.3cm} | 155 | 155 | \vspace{-0.3cm} | |
\begin{itemize}[noitemsep,nolistsep] | 156 | 156 | \begin{itemize}[noitemsep,nolistsep] | |
\item For select the filter design we need to evaluate the rejection like: | 157 | 157 | \item For select the filter design we need to evaluate the rejection like: | |
158 | 158 | |||
% \begin{enumerate}[noitemsep,nolistsep] | 159 | 159 | % \begin{enumerate}[noitemsep,nolistsep] | |
% \item The mean value of rejection | 160 | 160 | % \item The mean value of rejection | |
% \item The median value of rejection | 161 | 161 | % \item The median value of rejection | |
% \item A custom criterion (we penalize the rejection in base band and we keep only the maximum rejection on the filter tail) | 162 | 162 | % \item A custom criterion (we penalize the rejection in base band and we keep only the maximum rejection on the filter tail) | |
% \end{enumerate} | 163 | 163 | % \end{enumerate} | |
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\textwidth} | 164 | 164 | \begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\textwidth} | |
\includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/noise-rejection-mean} | 165 | 165 | \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/noise-rejection-mean} | |
%\captionof{figure} | 166 | 166 | %\captionof{figure} | |
{Criterion=mean value of rejection} | 167 | 167 | {Criterion=mean value of rejection} | |
\end{minipage} | 168 | 168 | \end{minipage} | |
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\textwidth} | 169 | 169 | \begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\textwidth} | |
\includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/noise-rejection-median} | 170 | 170 | \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/noise-rejection-median} | |
% \captionof{figure}{ | 171 | 171 | % \captionof{figure}{ | |
{Criterion=median value of rejection} | 172 | 172 | {Criterion=median value of rejection} | |
\end{minipage} | 173 | 173 | \end{minipage} | |
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\textwidth} | 174 | 174 | \begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\textwidth} | |
\includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/noise-rejection-custom} | 175 | 175 | \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/noise-rejection-custom} | |
% \captionof{figure} | 176 | 176 | % \captionof{figure} | |
{Criterion=max value of rejection} | 177 | 177 | {Criterion=max value of rejection} | |
\end{minipage} | 178 | 178 | \end{minipage} | |
\vspace{0.4cm} | 179 | 179 | \vspace{0.4cm} | |
\item All rejection criteria produce the same kind of result: the best filters seem to be in the edge of pyramid | 180 | 180 | \item All rejection criteria produce the same kind of result: the best filters seem to be in the edge of pyramid | |
\item For each criteria, we associate the rejection to the related filter and we let GLPK choose the best configuration\\ | 181 | 181 | \item For each criteria, we associate the rejection to the related filter and we let GLPK choose the best configuration\\ | |
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\textwidth} | 182 | 182 | \begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\textwidth} | |
\includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/fir-mono-vs-fir-series-noise-fixe-mean.pdf} | 183 | 183 | \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/fir-mono-vs-fir-series-noise-fixe-mean.pdf} | |
% \captionof{figure}{ | 184 | 184 | % \captionof{figure}{ | |
{Criterion=mean value of rejection} | 185 | 185 | {Criterion=mean value of rejection} | |
\end{minipage} | 186 | 186 | \end{minipage} | |
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\textwidth} | 187 | 187 | \begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\textwidth} | |
\includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/fir-mono-vs-fir-series-noise-fixe-median.pdf} | 188 | 188 | \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/fir-mono-vs-fir-series-noise-fixe-median.pdf} | |
% \captionof{figure} | 189 | 189 | % \captionof{figure} | |
{Criterion=median value of rejection} | 190 | 190 | {Criterion=median value of rejection} | |
\end{minipage} | 191 | 191 | \end{minipage} | |
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\textwidth} | 192 | 192 | \begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\textwidth} | |
\includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/fir-mono-vs-fir-series-noise-fixe-jmf.pdf} | 193 | 193 | \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/fir-mono-vs-fir-series-noise-fixe-jmf.pdf} | |
% \captionof{figure} | 194 | 194 | % \captionof{figure} | |
{Criterion=max value of rejection} | 195 | 195 | {Criterion=max value of rejection} | |
\end{minipage} | 196 | 196 | \end{minipage} | |
\vspace{0.4cm} | 197 | 197 | \vspace{0.4cm} | |
\item {\bf Rejection}: the last configuration is better than the first but worse | 198 | 198 | \item {\bf Rejection}: the last configuration is better than the first one but worse | |
than the monolithic filter | 199 | 199 | than the monolithic filter | |
\item Resource {\bf consumption} assessed by {\bf synthesizing designs in Vivado} (2017): filter cascade uses less | 200 | 200 | \item Resource {\bf consumption} assessed by {\bf synthesizing designs in Vivado} (2017): filter cascade uses less | |
resources than a single monolithic filter (too large to fit in Zedboard's Zynq 7020) | 201 | 201 | resources than a single monolithic filter (too large to fit in Zedboard's Zynq 7020) | |
\vspace{-.33cm} | 202 | 202 | \vspace{-.33cm} | |
\begin{center} | 203 | 203 | \begin{center} | |
\begin{tabular}{|c|ccccc|}\hline | 204 | 204 | \begin{tabular}{|c|ccccc|}\hline | |
FIR & BlockRAM36 & BlockRAM18 & LookUpTables & DSP & rejection (dB)\\\hline\hline | 205 | 205 | FIR & BlockRAM36 & BlockRAM18 & LookUpTables & DSP & rejection (dB)\\\hline\hline | |
1 (monolithic) & 1 & 0 & {\color{Red}76183} & 220 & -162 \\ | 206 | 206 | 1 (monolithic) & 1 & 0 & {\color{Red}76183} & 220 & -162 \\ | |
5 & 0 & 5 & {\color{Green}18597} & 220 & -160 \\ | 207 | 207 | 5 & 0 & 5 & {\color{Green}18597} & 220 & -160 \\ | |
10 & 0 & 8 & {\color{Green}24729} & 220 & -161 \\\hline\hline | 208 | 208 | 10 & 0 & 8 & {\color{Green}24729} & 220 & -161 \\\hline\hline | |
\textbf{Zynq 7020} & \textbf{140} & \textbf{280} & \textbf{53200} & \textbf{220} & \\\hline | 209 | 209 | \textbf{Zynq 7020} & \textbf{140} & \textbf{280} & \textbf{53200} & \textbf{220} & \\\hline | |
\end{tabular} | 210 | 210 | \end{tabular} | |
% \captionof{table}{Resources consumption when we use the configuration with the custom criterion} | 211 | 211 | % \captionof{table}{Resources consumption when we use the configuration with the custom criterion} | |
\end{center} | 212 | 212 | \end{center} | |
\item Filter cascade: {\bf targeted rejection level} (-160~dB) reached with the max(rejection) criterion | 213 | 213 | \item Filter cascade: {\bf targeted rejection level} (-160~dB) reached with the max(rejection) criterion |