final corrections

jfriedt
1 parent b312dca6a3
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 3 deletions Side-by-side Diff
ifcs2018_journal.tex
@@ -799,11 +799,10 @@
 \end{table}
 \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}
  
-From these tables, we can first state that almost configurations reach the targeted rejection
+From these tables, we can first state that almost all configurations reach the targeted rejection
 level or even better thanks to our underestimate of the cascade rejection as the sum of the
 individual filter rejection. The only exception is for the monolithic case ($n = 1$) in
-MIN/100. With our filter configurations there is no solution able to reach 100~dB of rejection.
-% we have stages lesser is the area occupied in arbitrary unit. JMF : je ne comprends pas cette phrase, AH: C'est déjà dit à la dernière phrase de ce paragraphe
+MIN/100: no solution is found for a single monolithic filter reach a 100~dB rejection.
 Futhermore, the area of the monolithic filter is twice as big as the two cascaded filters
 (1131 and 1760  arbitrary units v.s 547 and 903 arbitrary units for 60 and 80~dB rejection
 respectively). More generally, the more filters are cascaded, the lower the occupied area.
...	...	@@ -799,11 +799,10 @@
799	799	\end{table}
800	800	\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}
801	801
802		-From these tables, we can first state that almost configurations reach the targeted rejection
	802	+From these tables, we can first state that almost all configurations reach the targeted rejection
803	803	level or even better thanks to our underestimate of the cascade rejection as the sum of the
804	804	individual filter rejection. The only exception is for the monolithic case ($n = 1$) in
805		-MIN/100. With our filter configurations there is no solution able to reach 100~dB of rejection.
806		-% we have stages lesser is the area occupied in arbitrary unit. JMF : je ne comprends pas cette phrase, AH: C'est déjà dit à la dernière phrase de ce paragraphe
	805	+MIN/100: no solution is found for a single monolithic filter reach a 100~dB rejection.
807	806	Futhermore, the area of the monolithic filter is twice as big as the two cascaded filters
808	807	(1131 and 1760 arbitrary units v.s 547 and 903 arbitrary units for 60 and 80~dB rejection
809	808	respectively). More generally, the more filters are cascaded, the lower the occupied area.