diff --git a/ifcs2018_journal.tex b/ifcs2018_journal.tex
index 895a6bf..2dcfb5f 100644
--- a/ifcs2018_journal.tex
+++ b/ifcs2018_journal.tex
@@ -799,11 +799,10 @@ Table~\ref{tbl:gurobi_min_100} shows the results obtained by the filter solver f
 \end{table}
 \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}
 
-From these tables, we can first state that almost configurations reach the targeted rejection
+From these tables, we can first state that almost all configurations reach the targeted rejection
 level or even better thanks to our underestimate of the cascade rejection as the sum of the
 individual filter rejection. The only exception is for the monolithic case ($n = 1$) in
-MIN/100. With our filter configurations there is no solution able to reach 100~dB of rejection.
-% we have stages lesser is the area occupied in arbitrary unit. JMF : je ne comprends pas cette phrase, AH: C'est déjà dit à la dernière phrase de ce paragraphe
+MIN/100: no solution is found for a single monolithic filter reach a 100~dB rejection.
 Futhermore, the area of the monolithic filter is twice as big as the two cascaded filters
 (1131 and 1760  arbitrary units v.s 547 and 903 arbitrary units for 60 and 80~dB rejection
 respectively). More generally, the more filters are cascaded, the lower the occupied area.